{"id":336,"date":"2018-03-12T20:32:15","date_gmt":"2018-03-13T00:32:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hydrouncertainty.org\/?p=336"},"modified":"2019-01-15T11:57:36","modified_gmt":"2019-01-15T16:57:36","slug":"meeting-details-and-general-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/hydrouncertainty.org\/2018\/03\/12\/meeting-details-and-general-update\/","title":{"rendered":"Meeting details and general update"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
I attended a tele-conference today (3\/12\/2018) organized by Jeffrey McDonnell, the President of the AGU Hydrology Section, for the Section\u2019s Technical Committee (TC) chairs. There are a number of items that I would like to share with you and, at the meantime, to ask for your inputs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
AGU is planning for a number of activities for this year\u2019s AGU Centennial celebration. One of them is to identify the breakthroughs that have been made in the last contrary. WRR (and actually all AGU journals) will have a special issues for hydrologic \u201cgame changers\u201d, e.g., paradigm-shift concepts, innovative sensor techniques, and computational algorithms and\/or software. The identification of breakthrough is more like a review of academic history of hydrology. How were the breakthroughs initiated? How did they get there? Which paper or papers were they originally published? What have we learned during the breakthrough-making process? For our TC, it would be interesting that we identify the game changers for hydrologic uncertainty analysis. Please come up with one or two breakthroughs, and justify why you think that they are truly breakthroughs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n